| Pages: 1 [2] 3 |
21. Can someone please explain the non-vanity issue? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kara Kugisa The problem would be if a ship can be bought without it being built. No mineral requirements mean mining etc becomes pointless. If its just a Blueprint then not an issue.
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.29 12:12:00
|
22. Dear Lynch Mobs: Thank you for your idiocy, move along now. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Alt.
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.28 13:02:00
|
23. "Every Item In Game is Made by Players" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jasdemi Edited by: Jasdemi on 28/06/2011 10:45:04 "Every Item In Game is Made by Players" is completely false. Pathetic noob. Doesn't even know anything about EVE. You're no worthy monocle wearer. Good argument. I l...
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.28 10:46:00
|
24. "Every Item In Game is Made by Players" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
"Every Item In Game is Made by Players" Used to say that to people when I was telling them about EVE. It's a massive statement to make. People who are not familiar with EVE or even MMOs's seem to find that concept really cool... PreEdit: I know ...
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.28 10:43:00
|
25. Comming Soon(tm) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Issue 1: Removal of the "Hanger View" Why all the "Rage"?: Not everyone can run or wants to run CQ. Many were/are extremely happy with the old Hanger view and "Ship spinning". Most requested feature of CQ testing, ignored by CCP. Com...
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.28 10:33:00
|
26. Haters dont even know what they hate - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP alt.
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.28 09:54:00
|
27. Higher subcription fees instead of ruining the game - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Maa Ku on 28/06/2011 09:29:10 Derp. MT is not the problem. It's trust, prices and the hanger view people are raging at. Higher subs is a terrible idea. Seriously CCP, get rid of the PLEX > AUR exchange and just make the mono...
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.28 09:29:00
|
28. Your voices have been heard. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Good speech. CCP is not our enemy and they must understand that all the rage and uproar is because we do not want to see a game we all play go down the pan. I's because people care. If they didn't care, they'd just leave and go play another game.
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.28 09:06:00
|
29. *YAWN* And the new poutrage of the day is.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP alt detected.
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.27 15:57:00
|
30. GIVE IDEAS for NON-vanity, NON-advantage items and services for AUR ! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
- Light Sabre - Robe-of-Honesty - Station hangar environment - Expansions that don't break all the stuff I use But Seriously: -
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.27 15:53:00
|
31. New Dev Blog: The realities of EVE - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Zulu, please don't take all this personally. I know it probably is not a great week for you. We are only rising against the changes because we want the game to be good. It's because we care about the game not because anyone enjoys being this way...
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.26 21:30:00
|
32. New Dev Blog: The realities of EVE - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Maa Ku on 26/06/2011 21:23:27 Better than the Friday blog. Still sounds like you're telling everyone it's not a problem. It is a problem. You must understand that the reason why a lot of players play this game is the really open...
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.26 21:21:00
|
33. An overdue apology and request for parley - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Pherick Sjang Zulu's latest, slightly less inflammatory but still irritating devblog Thanks - its annoying trying to fgind blogs on this site
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.26 21:12:00
|
34. An overdue apology and request for parley - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I cant see any new blogs so I'm guessing Zulu's us not out yet on all this mess. Looking forward to it for sure.
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.26 21:08:00
|
35. [CROWD SOURCE] Microtransactions - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
NO Vanity only if they are a) Cheap b) Not linked to ISK - just make em $ only and be done with it.
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.26 20:59:00
|
36. What should we name this event? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
"The Day EVE Stood Still"
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.26 20:53:00
|
37. Vote: should there be a ceasefire until CSM and CCP bring a statement? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No. Ceasefire = problem gone away = no action.
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.26 20:51:00
|
38. Keeping tally of unsubbed playes in googledoc, need moar names&links! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Maa Ku on 26/06/2011 20:43:19 I cancelled two subs. -2
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.06.26 20:43:00
|
39. Noctis - post-incursion L4 hoover - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Ceti Lomax Most L4 missions won't let you run MWDs. Best use an afterburner and istabs. I agree with the more tractors and fewer salvagers comment. :) You can use MWD post-incursion. In fact it is the post-incursionine...
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.02.02 01:03:00
|
40. Noctis - post-incursion L4 hoover - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Tippia A couple of things. Ditch the istabs ù the MWD means you will always align in 10s anyway (except when exiting stations). What you fit there instead is up to you ù expanders being the obvious choice, but they'll kill ...
- by Maa Ku - at 2011.02.01 11:29:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |